logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2012.12.27 2012고단1363
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in the business of giving users financial benefits or loss according to the outcome of gambling using machines, instruments, etc. which are likely to instigate speculative spirit, such as speculative electronic gaming machines.

On December 2, 2011, the Defendant, along with C, D, E, F, G, H, and I’s name address, set up 35 game “Arri-2” electronic gaming machines, which were modified at the “J Entertainment room”, and the Defendant, C, and D, by investing funds in the game room, are responsible for the overall operation of the game room, and they are responsible for the purchase of the game machine and the overall operation of the game room. G, when regulating, takes charge of the so-called “the head of the management division in charge of the game room,” E takes charge of the head of the management division in charge of the game room, and F, takes charge of the exchange employee who takes charge of exchanging the call of customers, and H and I, in order to operate the game room in such a way as to take charge of the employee who takes care of customers.

The Defendant, along with C, D, E, F, G, H, H, and I’s non-disclosure, installed 35 game equipment altered from December 2, 201 to December 5, 201 in the said “J entertainment room” and provided an unspecified number of customers who found the said game site for use.

Defendant

If customers request the exchange of plastic gifts acquired through the use of the said game product, etc., they operated the game hall in such a way that customers are going to be out of the game room and exchange 4,500 won after deducting 10% per given gift.

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in speculative activities in collusion with C, D, E, F, G, H, I's name, and I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of C by the prosecution (paragraphs 2 and 3);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the prosecutor's statement of H;

1. Articles 30(1)1 and 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. concerning the crime

arrow