logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.2.2. 선고 2017누73121 판결
실업급여지급제한및반환처분취소
Cases

2017Nu73121 Revocation of Disposition to restrict unemployment benefits payment and return

Plaintiff Appellant

A

Defendant Elives

The Administrator of the Gyeonggi Local Labor Agency;

The first instance judgment

Suwon District Court Decision 2016Gudan2599 Decided September 8, 2017

Conclusion of Pleadings

January 12, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

February 2, 2018

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke the restriction on the payment and the return of unemployment against the plaintiff on November 6, 2015.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

The reasons for this judgment are as follows: (a) the reasons for the judgment of the first instance other than adding or adding the following are as follows; (b) therefore, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. (c) The relevant Acts and subordinate statutes are as stated in the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes after the 03th 13th 13th 14th 14th 2th 200.

2. Conclusion

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

Judges

The presiding judge, senior judge

Judges Shin Jin-hee

Judges Lee Jae-chul

Attached Form

A person shall be appointed.

arrow