logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.10.18 2016고단2617
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Decision 2016 Ma 7029 Maz. 1 to 5, 6-a, and 6-b, the daily list of crimes in attached Form A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On December 5, 2013, A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court on May 16, 2014. On August 23, 2013, Defendant F was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and six months for rape injury in the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch Branch, and the said decision became final and conclusive on August 31, 2013. Defendant J was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and six months for the crime of rape in the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch. On February 6, 2015, Defendant J was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a suspended sentence of ten months for fraud at the Busan District Court on February 14, 2015.

Defendant A is the adviser of M Co., Ltd. in Busan East-gu L 205.

P with respect to the construction of new local apartment buildings in the Geum-gu Busan Metropolitan Government P, P, Q is a stock company, Q is a stock company, M is a sub-subcontract and sub-subcontract to R Co., Ltd., and M is carrying out the construction of transportation of the above local sand.

On July 5, 2015, the Defendant calculated KRW 85,000 per 1 dump truck on the surface of the State which caused the transportation of soil and sand to the victim S who is the actual operator of R at the restaurant at the site of the construction site of the construction site of the Han-gu Busan N apartment.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the transportation cost even if the victim had transported earth and sand at the apartment construction site.

The Defendant had the victim transport dump trucks from that time to August 31, 2015 at the above construction site at a total of 1907 pump trucks, but did not pay KRW 76,781,000 of the transport cost, thereby acquiring economic benefits equivalent to that amount.

"2016 Highest 7029"

1. Although Defendant A and B did not have a traffic accident, the Defendants conspired to obtain insurance money from the insurance company by making a false report to the insurance company as if the traffic accident occurred, and according to the above conspiracys:

A. Defendant B, around 17:15 on July 4, 2012, 201, is driving at the same parking lot located in Busan Dong-gu 2, Busan.

arrow