Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
가. 원고는 2012. 4. 24. C으로부터 파주시 D 지상 1동 일반철골구조 기타지붕 제1종근린생활시설 197.9㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 제1건물’이라 한다)를 임차하여 운반기계 제조 및 수리업, 운반기계 판매업 등을 하고 있고, 피고 B은 2013. 6. 10.경 C으로부터 위 토지 지상 2동 일반철골구조 기타지붕 제2종근린생활시설 478.72㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 제2건물’이라 한다)를 임차하여 E라는 상호로 가구 제조ㆍ판매업을 하고 있는데, 이 사건 제1건물은 서쪽에, 이 사건 제2건물은 북쪽에 별지 배치도와 같이 ‘┍ ’형태로 인접해 있다.
B. On January 15, 2013, Defendant B entered into an insurance contract with Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance”) with the following content under the name of F, a wife.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant insurance contract”): The insurance period of the instant building No. 2 as carbonless Samsung Fire Property Insurance: from January 11, 2013 to January 11, 2018: 10,000,000 won
C. On April 3, 2014, from around 20:30 to 00:05 on the following day, a fire (hereinafter “instant fire”) occurred in the building Nos. 1 and 2, and the Plaintiff, which was kept in custody in the instant building No. 1 and 2, was removed from the previous building No. 1 and all parts, machinery, etc.
[Ground of Recognition] In without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, Gap evidence 4, 5, Gap evidence 6-1 through 15, Gap evidence 7-1, 2, Eul evidence 2-1, 2-2, Eul evidence 3, Eul evidence 4-1, 2, Eul evidence 4-2, Eul evidence 5-7, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the fire of this case occurred due to the care care divism for the chemical slopings installed in the building No. 2 of this case by Defendant B, and Defendant B is the above chemical slopings.