A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:40 on May 3, 2015, the Defendant, on the road in the East Sea, filed a 112 report to the effect that the Defendant had a risk of causing a female accident by walking along the roadway while under the influence of alcohol, and requested the Defendant to go to India by India, a police officer belonging to the East Sea Police Station Emba, a police officer belonging to the East Sea Police Station Emba, who called, and the said F, stated that the Defendant “I will interfere with the instant activities, I will see that you will do so,” and assault the Defendant, i.e., raising the Defendant to India’s face to the delivery.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case by the F Assistants 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentence of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act shall be set within the range of the sentencing guidelines (within the scope of imprisonment for not more than eight months: Performance of Official Duties, obstruction of performance of official duties, obstruction of performance of official duties, type 1, mitigation area (limited to cases where the degree of violence is minor), and the execution thereof shall be postponed, comprehensively taking into account various circumstances, such as the following: the defendant's recognition of the crime, the fact that there is no criminal history exceeding the same criminal record or fine, the fact that there is no criminal history of the defendant in excess of the same criminal record or fine; and