A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 16, 2015, at around 11:45, the Defendant: (a) invadedd the property into the reading room on the fourth floor of the general library of the new university located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 143, through an open entrance opened in the view of theft; and (b) the victim C used the crepan in a crepan in which the crepane is located, thereby taking 130,000 won in the market price of the victim’s possession, with 13,000 won in the crepane North Korea.

2. On April 23, 2015, at around 17:30 on April 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) intruded the property into the reading room through an open entrance with an open entrance; (b) then, the victim D cret North Korea on his/her book and stolen the property with one million won of the market price, which is the victim’s possession, using the cresh in which the victim D cret North Korea was placed on his/her book.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement of C and D;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was the previous conviction of a fine of the same kind in 2014, the crime of this case is deemed to be bad.

However, since the defendant has a depth of his mistake and has caused the crime of this case since there was no money to pay children's child support after divorce, the motive for the crime of this case is considered, there are circumstances to be taken into account, but has been invaded at a place where outside people can easily enter, not an indoor residential space, but an indoor residential space, and there is no criminal record of suspended execution or more, the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the order.