logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2020.02.06 2019고단2351
특수협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A special intimidation: (a) around 05:47 April 18, 2019, the Defendant: (b) told the victim of the victim D (the 50-year-old) who was the main owner of the “C”, “the time for the Defendant to complete the business,” who had the words “the time for the Defendant to complete the business,” while drinking alcohol at two times in the main place of “C” located on the Jinhae-si B and 7, the main owner of the main store; (c) had the beer’s disease on the floor; (d) had the beer’s disease on the table; and (e) had the beer’s disease on the table, broken the two main disease on the table; and (e) had the shouldered the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object, and threatened the victim by having the victim “the time for the Defendant to complete the business,” who was at the main store.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place of the foregoing paragraph (1) above, carried out the following questions: “A police officer is bombed, if the police officer was bomb, if the police officer was bomb, and if the police officer was bomb, if the police officer was bomb, if the police officer was bomb, and if the police officer was bomb, if the police officer was bomb, if the police officer was bomb, if the police officer was fomb, and if the police officer was bomb, the police officer was bomb, and was bomed to F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting off the scene of the case, photographing photographs, and the like site filmings;

1. Articles 284, 283(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime concerned;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order: The circumstances where the nature of the crime is considerably poor, such as threatening the owner of the main place of business, threatening the police officer dispatched, etc.; the victim does not want the punishment; and the police officer in the course of obstruction of performance of official duties.

arrow