Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) expressed that “I am under the influence of alcohol, I am under the influence of alcohol, I am under the influence of alcohol, and I am under the demand for returning home from the slope E belonging to the above restaurant proprietor’s report; (b) I am under the call of “I am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of E, I am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of am under the influence of the Defendant. I am under the back. I am under the back. I am under the back. I am under the control of the Defendant.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the lives, bodies and property of the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment Order of Provisional Payment Order is that the police officer, who was drunk at a restaurant, received 112 report and called out after receiving the 112 report, takes a bath to the police officer, brea the police officer, booms the clothes, and interferes with the legitimate performance of official duties by assaulting him/her, such as booming him/her, in his/her hand, and thereby obstructing the execution of official duties. Therefore, the nature of the crime is not good in light of the details and method

In addition, the defendant committed a second offense without being aware of the fact that he had been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for other crimes.

However, the defendant shows an attitude to reflect in depth the mistake.

It seems to be a crime that has lost self-control power in a timely manner and has committed contingently.

Until now, there has been no record of punishment for crimes against public officials or public offices, and there has been no record of violence in recent 20 years.

In addition, the sentencing conditions, such as the age, sex, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered, and the punishment shall be determined as per the order.