Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

On December 23, 2016, the Defendants: (a) found the victim E (the 32-year old), who was satisf in front of the Incheon Southern-gu, Incheon, and (b) brought about the Defendants’ grandchildren; (c) said, Defendant A said that the victim “patfing the four-yearme,” and Defendant A said that “patfing the victim’s breath,” fating the victim’s breath, and prevented the victim’s body going above the floor, and Defendant B said that the victim’s inside was drinking.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as salted tensions and tensions that require treatment for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. 112 A list of reported cases;

1. Ethical certificate of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by E;

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for negligence

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendants charged with the costs of lawsuit: The Defendants and the defense counsel asserted to the effect that the Defendants did not jointly injure the victim, as stated in the facts charged, as stated in the judgment below, since they attempted to prevent the victims of satise from getting out of the country at the time, the Defendants and the defense counsel tried to prevent them from getting out of the country.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., ① the victim stated to the effect that he/she sustained injuries from the Defendants consistently from the investigation process to the trial process; ② the witness F, who was undergoing the instant field, had been witnessed to the Defendants’ crime and reported 112, and the investigation process and the victim.