All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the victim spits or spits the nature of the defendants' spits in front of the entrances of the defendants, and the victim opened a spite door and unilaterally avoided spits by using the rain taken in the defendant's house. Although the defendants did not assault the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below, the court below erred in misunderstanding of facts by finding the defendants guilty by using the statements of the victim which are not reliable as evidence.

Judgment

The court below duly adopted and examined the following circumstances, namely, ① the victim consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and consistently stated that “I am under the influence of the defendant B, who was in the front of the defendant’s house, followed the defendant A’s son and knife with a mil, and the defendant B assaulted the defendant with a golf seed,” and ② The victim stated that “I am under the jurisdiction of the court of the court of the court below that I am under the jurisdiction of the court of the court of the case “I am under the jurisdiction of the court of the court of the first instance, 57 am under the jurisdiction of the court of the court of the court of the first instance,” and the victim stated that “I am under the jurisdiction of the investigative agency of the case, I am under the jurisdiction of the defendant B am under the jurisdiction of the investigative agency of the defendant B, who was the victim’s chest at the time of this case’s questioning, and the victim was also the victim’s am under the jurisdiction of the investigative agency of the case.”