Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 1, 2014, at around 23:45, Defendant A’s single criminal defendant: (a) entered the Fju place operated by the victim E (V, 44 years old, and Chinese nationality) under the ground of Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, to enter the customer and ordered drinking and requested a female entertainment loan; (b) the victim refused to read “the victim was sent to the house, but there is no hys on the house of Korea”; (c) the victim’s neck who was going to the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous articles and inflicted injury on the victim, such as the 20-day medical treatment.

2. The Defendants’ co-offendered Defendants were at the same time and place as set forth in Paragraph 1, and at the same time and place as set forth in Paragraph 1, and the victim attempted to flee after the above act. Defendant A took the victim’s face, chest, etc. on drinking, Defendant B was sleeping the victim’s head by combining it, and Defendant B was slicking the victim’s face, her sent, and her body.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statements of witnesses E and G in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Statement of prosecutorial statement concerning E;

1. A E-document;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Photographs of each victim;

1. The photograph of the criminal intent [the defendant Eul only made a fighting and did not assault the victim, but the defendant Eul also took part in the defendant Eul's investigation agency and the defendant Eul's consistent statement in this court and the defendant Eul's statement in this court that it is hard to believe the victim's head head (the defendant Eul's statement is inconsistent because the non-record G's statement is not consistent and it is hard to believe the whole statement as it is because it is hard to believe the victim's head head).