The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not state to G and H that “F would not make a false information.”

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found all of the facts charged of this case guilty is erroneous by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, G, at the court of the lower court and the investigative agency, based on the following circumstances: (a) G, based on the fact that “any other person has provided information to a witness,” and (b) whether the Defendant was a drug offender committed in the detention room.

Then, whether or not the Defendant

“Along with work outside the F,” the term “assumptive from the outside.”

“(The trial record 128 pages, 6 pages of evidence)” and “Is the Defendant “Is the person F in the detention room in the waiting room for the Daegu detention center” around January 2016.

b. Maddar in a false or misleading dispute

“Written know-how.”

“(The trial record 129 pages 7 of the evidence record)” means that at the time of the instant case and its circumstances have been consistently stated to the effect that “(the trial record 129 pages 7 of the evidence record)”, “H was arrested by the Defendant working in Fa” at the court of original instance and the investigative agency.

The F was referred to as “the deceased.”

“A consistent statement was made to the effect that “” was consistent (for example, page 47 of the trial record, page 194 of the evidence record), and in the court of original instance, “the Defendant did not speak two times.”

If we see only snow, I tried to see the Flock through this.

“The statement to the effect that “” was stated (the trial record 53 pages), ③ G first met the Defendant at the detention room of the Daegu Suhyup Police Station, and thereafter was confined to the detention center of Daegu, and there appears to have existed a strong motive for G to make a false statement, such as the victim’s relationship with the victim, etc. (the trial record 62 pages, 129-130 pages) and the victim was first met (the trial record 62 pages, 129-130 pages).

The above statement of H cannot be seen as the defendant in comparison with the above statement of G.