The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant is not guilty of committing an indecent act against the victim as stated in the facts charged.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged by the victim's statement, etc. suspected of credibility is erroneous.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (2 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) the victim was from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court, to the court of the lower court, and (ii) the victim was on board a subway train of subway No. 9 in the J station, and at the time of K station, the she was contacted as if she was her her son’s her son was fast at the left.

On the other hand, we divided workplace carnets with abnormal thoughts, but her son was her son, but the Defendant her son was her son.

Now, the defendant told that he will start to work for the defendant, and the defendant "I send the crime to the defendant."

“.....”

The author sent the Defendant’s appearance, etc. using the text message of the cellular phone;

12 reported to the 112th police, and the defendant was placed in place of the defendant in order to confirm that the defendant gets off from the subway until the police.

The defendant was found to have tried to look at the police in L's station, and the defendant was out of and concealed in the gap of people, and the police notified the police of the location of the defendant and arrested the defendant.

The overall statement to the effect that “” is consistently stated, ② the victim makes a very specific and detailed statement about the background of the indecent act committed by the Defendant or the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc. as above, and the explanation of the situation is reasonable, ③ the “investigation Report (Attachment to the 112 Handling Table)” duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, and the “Investigation Report (Listening to the statement of the police officer)” are written.