logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.28 2018고단5179
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 18, 2017: (a) around 08:19, the Defendant boarded the subway of the line No. 9 that was operated to the seat of the airport in the high speed terminal station located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul to the seat of the Kimpo Airport in the area of 19-11 of the distribution of Seocho-gu, Seoul; (b) was pushed back to the part of his her her son’s her son by using a large number of passengers near the D Station, following the congested gap of the victim E (n.e., 21 years old); and (c) was pushed back to the part of his her her son’s son.

In other words, the victim’s her her her her her her her her her m was determined.

2. On May 18, 2018, the Defendant 19:08, on board the subway of the line of 9 that was operated from the above high speed terminal station to the seat of Kimpo Airport at the Kimpo Airport on the 19:08, and was pushed down to the subway near the F Station of the Do after being pushed back to the victim G (the string, 19 years old), etc. by using a large number of passengers in the vicinity of the F Station, and then taken off the body of the Defendant from his her her her her sonm in the part of his her sonm.

In other words, there was a fixed amount of money on the part of the fore part of the victim, which is below the end of the victim.

3. On May 25, 2018, at around 17:30, the Defendant boarding the subway of the line No. 9 that was operated from the above high speed terminal station to the Kimpo Airport of Kimpo-si, and then was pushed down after being pushed back to the victim H (V, 31 years old), etc. by using a large number of passengers in the vicinity of the D Station, and taking the body back to the part where the damaged person’s her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

In the end of the victim, the defendant considered the sperm on the part of the part of the victim, thereby committing an indecent act on the victims in a place where the general public is concentrated three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G (tentative name), E, and H;

1. Each gene appraisal report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Chapter Two of the damaged photographs;

1. Article 11 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and Selection of Punishment Thereof;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed against a person attending a lecture;

arrow