1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 29, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with the status of stay in short-term visits (C-3) on a short-term basis (C-3), and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on December 6, 2013.

B. On August 12, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be prejudicial to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. On September 15, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on September 15, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on July 1, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff worked as a person in charge of the “Addis Keme-Can fire station” as an ozone layer from the Ethiopia region of the Ethiopia.

The plaintiff has caused conflicts with Egrasy in the workplace on the ground of Magrasy, and has been at a disadvantage in personnel affairs and has been at a disadvantage in personnel affairs, and there has been a complaint on the employment method with discrimination between Magras, but has also been threatened to life and body.

In particular, the Plaintiff reported to the superior agency that the EPDF members of EPDF, three members of EPDF, who are members of EPDF, were dismissed, and one of them was administered, and thus he was given a warning of retaliation from the related parties.

Therefore, in the event that the plaintiff returns to Ethiopia, it is likely to suffer from gambling on the ground that he is Ethiopia.