1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on June 19, 2013 with the status of stay in short-term visits (C-3) from Ethiopia’s Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (hereinafter “Ethiopia”), and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on June 28, 2013.

B. On June 5, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be prejudicial to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. On June 13, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on June 13, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on April 2, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was employed as a lus Adis Abba-based lusopon, around 2009, as an lusopon (or around 2010), as an lusopon, as an lusopon of the Adis Abba-based lusopon, as an lusopon.

Since the Plaintiff was employed as a dance member of the national theater, the Plaintiff was forced to join a political party, participate in a political event, or participate in an election campaign from the government and the brigade (Ethopian People) and was discriminated against in promotion compared to the dance group on the ground that the Plaintiff is an lumosis.

For this reason, the Plaintiff was selected as a member of the performance group for commemorative events in 50 weeks of Han-Ethiopia, and entered the Republic of Korea, and applied for refugee recognition.

Therefore, in the event that the Plaintiff returned to Ethiopia, the instant disposition, which was taken on a different premise, is unlawful, even though it is likely that the Plaintiff might be stuffed by the government and women for the said reason.

나. 관계 법령 ▣ 구 출입국관리법 2012. 2. 10. 법률...