All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime of the same kind even though he had a previous conviction, including a previous conviction, even though he had a previous conviction, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant.

However, the Defendant’s mistake is divided, and the crime of this case is one of the concurrent crimes established in the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and the crime of this case is one of the concurrent crimes established in the latter part of Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act. In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the pleadings of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime was committed, the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and it does not seem to be too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.