All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the nature of the instant crime is not very good, and that the Defendant has a record of punishment not less than 20 times prior to the instant case, strict punishment against the Defendant is necessary.

However, considering the circumstances of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate, and is too heavy or too unreasonable, since the defendant's crime of this case seems not to affect the result of the criminal trial subject to the judgment, there is no criminal conviction for the defendant, and there is no criminal conviction for the defendant, and the crime of this case must be considered in the concurrent crime relationship between the defendant for whom the judgment has become final and conclusive and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act. In addition, considering the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the above argument of the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.