1. The Plaintiff’s obligation based on the loan certificate issued on June 29, 2012 against the Defendant is KRW 21,892,816 and its corresponding liability.

1. In full view of the purport of the Plaintiff’s documentary evidence No. 1’s statement, it can be acknowledged that there was a monetary transaction between the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and F through the Plaintiff’s account for self-reliance of the Livestock Industry Cooperatives (D) and the savings account at the Seocheon-dong Branch (E).

Defendant 43,00,000,000 B (Defendant Branch) on June 29, 2012, Plaintiff 3 on July 1, 2012, 2012, Defendant 40,7,668,870 on April 26, 2013, Defendant 40,000 on May 23, 2013, Defendant 50, 10,000,000 on May 23, 2013, Defendant 10, 10,000 on May 20, 2016, Defendant 10, 200, KRW 66,000 on May 20, 200, Plaintiff 200 on May 31, 2013, Plaintiff 10,000 on June 10, 10, 200, Plaintiff 36, 208, Plaintiff 16, 208

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) from June 29, 2012 to July 2, 2012, the Defendant kept a total of KRW 156,68,570 on three occasions to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff returned KRW 225,601,00 to the Defendant and the F for eight times during the period from April 26, 2013 to August 1, 2013. If the amount is appropriated for the principal and interest of each of the above custody deposits and for the statutory damages calculated at the rate of 5% per annum, the amount exceeds KRW 68,225,829, and the interest amount exceeds KRW 68,225,829. Accordingly, the Defendant and the Plaintiff should return the above KRW 200,000 to the Plaintiff by 205,000,0000,000 won per annum 124,000,0000 won per annum 20,000 won per annum 208.136.

B. Considering the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 14 through 7, 10 through 12, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7 and 12, the plaintiff's husband G, the intervenor joining the defendant, and Eul's husband I shall be the husband of the plaintiff's husband, the defendant joining the defendant, and