logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.26 2017노2409
변호사법위반
Text

All appeals by the Defendants and by the Prosecutor against Defendant A are dismissed.

Reasons

1. In a case where Defendant A submitted the grounds for appeal only without submitting a document stating the grounds for appeal and the appointment of counsel after the expiration of the period for submitting a statement of reasons for appeal (see, e.g., Supreme Court Order 69Mo68, Oct. 4, 1969; Supreme Court Order 2001Do4839, Nov. 1, 2001). According to the records, even if the court received the notice of receipt of court records on April 28, 2017, the Defendant A did not submit a statement of reasons for appeal within the period for filing an appeal x 7 months prescribed in Article 361-3(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 】 (the attorney-at-law in charge of D did not submit a statement of reasons for appeal x 10 months x 7 months x 10 months x 10 months x 10 days x 17 months x 20 days x 17 months x 201.

Even if it is merely a method of consuming criminal proceeds, and it is not a deduction from criminal proceeds to be collected (see Supreme Court Decision 2005Do7146, Jun. 29, 2006, etc.). Thus, the defendant spent 22,100,00 won in total under the name of advertising expenses and rents between 17 months.

Even if it is not deducted from criminal proceeds, the defense counsel's above assertion is without merit).2.

arrow