logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.06.19 2016가단201033
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 6, 2006, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant, and provided work in the “D” located in the Chungcheongbuk-gun C (hereinafter “instant workplace”).

B. On May 14, 2013, at around 11:00, the Plaintiff: (a) placed a steel string in the subsequent processing plant of the instant plant (hereinafter “instant forkeep”); (b) placed the wooden string in the instant plant; (c) placed the wooden string to check the stringer; (d) went on the top; and (e) fell from the height of the body to the floor at a height of 3 meters above the ground.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

The plaintiff suffered injury, due to the accident in this case, such as damage to the number of dubs and other details of uncertainty, damage to the dubs and dubs and other dubs and dubs and dubs, and other damage to the dubs and dubs of dubs and other dubs, dubs and dubs without any open address, dubs and dubs and dubs of the two dubs, dubs and dubs and dubs, which are accompanied by the dubs and dubs and dubs of the two dubs, which are accompanied by the dubs and dub

After the instant accident, the Plaintiff received, respectively, KRW 121,90,320 of temporary disability compensation benefits and KRW 399,07,300 of medical care benefits, after recognizing the injury caused by the instant accident from the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service as an occupational accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 4, Gap evidence 5-1 through 9, Gap evidence 8, 13, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-4, Eul evidence 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. Before the occurrence of the instant accident, the Defendant had the Plaintiff conduct the duty of checking the Crecers. At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant did not put an alternative human resources to conduct safety management at the Defendant’s workplace, and did not keep the equipment, such as mobile rains or safety bridges, so as to ensure safe work.

arrow