A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 3, 2016, at C District District in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, around 21:00, the Defendant her walked on a road while drunkly under the influence of alcohol with another person who was brought in the said District while being temporarily protected by police officers belonging to the said District, and the Defendant her rioted the disturbance to the police officers belonging to the said District, and the Defendant her rioted against the disturbance.

In the name of the Defendant, the kne, knee, knee, knee, and the knee of the Defendant’s head, the knee of the Defendant’s chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning temporary protection measures by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. A report on investigation (in cases of CCTV images in the C District, the application of statutes);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not sufficient to form a crime by assaulting a police officer while the defendant was taking protective measures against the earth while under the influence of alcohol. However, the sentence is determined as ordered by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, etc., and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and theories of this case, such as the fact that the defendant reflects his/her own crime, that the degree of assault was not severe, that the defendant did not have the same criminal history, and that the defendant