(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.23 2017고정3337

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.23 2017고정3337

절도

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On August 22, 2017, the Defendant, as an acting driver, placed the victim’s 2,800,000 won in cash at a place less than 200 meters away from the above public parking lot, among the Do in which the victim E is on board and the F of the wife population is working at the head of the D Costast and the F of the F of the wife population, as an acting driver, on August 22, 2017.

At around 16:31 on the same day, the Defendant discovered a wall, which the damaged person gets in the vicinity of the long distance, and then stolen it.

2. Determination

A. The evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case includes the notification of the department related to the instant report in 112, the E-written statement, the internal investigation report (verification of the victim's CCTV and the victim's statement), the internal investigation report (verification of CCTV after leaving the vehicle as an agent driver), the investigation report (verification of the suspect's statement), the investigation report (verification of the toilet location, etc.), the investigation report (verification of the suspect's statement), the CCTV screen CD, etc.

According to the above evidence, the following facts are recognized.

1) In order to send D vehicles, E left the vehicle to the Defendant, who is a consignee, while boarding the vehicle at C public parking lot and affixing the address at the NAS and leaving the vehicle to the middle distance.

E cited the wallet as his hand and on the above vehicle, E discovered the fact that there is no wallet, and made a phone call to the defendant, and changed again.

The defendant has returned back again, and E did not find a wall.

E The same shall apply to the case where they are fitted to D vehicles.

I think.

2) D Vehicles went away from around 16:22, around 16:23, around 16:23, and around 16:23, E left the Defendant’s wall.

The telephone was called.

While the defendant was driving the above vehicle and returned to a public parking lot C, he was fixed at around 16:31 and on the vehicle.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2018.12.21 2018노5516

-수원지방법원 2018.12.21. 선고 2018노5516 판결

-의정부지방법원 2015.06.19 2014고단3715

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.10 2020고단8799

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.11.01 2018고단1604