logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.05.17 2018고단685
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

However, the sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 18, 2017, the Defendant on violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes (Assaults, etc. of Drivers) and special intimidation was on board the back seat of D-si operated by the Victim C (57 Do) on the back seat of the victim C (57 Dop) and the victim came to arrive in the vicinity of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu Dap Police Station, which is located in 135, and the victim arrived near the destination.

“In the end, the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part, without any particular reason.”

The victim who is drawn up on the lower part of the victim “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am dead;

With the knowledge of who could be in the military, the attitude was expressed that the victim's life or body would be at any risk while driving.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the driver of a vehicle in operation with dangerous articles.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of special duties on the same day, around 23:40 on the same day, she driven a taxi to the front door of the above police station in order for her victim C to escape from harm caused by such intimidation, and her light F, a person affiliated with the police station E, working at the police station, she dices the Defendant “Isn’t dice as his son.”

“Iskeep the above rank held by Iskicker.”

Hably, the top of the police and the top of the police, "hing the scarma and the scarba," and the scarba of the scarba, shall be discarded.

“In doing so, I expressed an attitude that would inflict any harm on the life or body of the police.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of government office buildings.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. A list of seizure records (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Article 5-10(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assaults by drivers), Articles 284, 283(1) (special intimidation) of the Criminal Act, Articles 144(1) and 136 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts.

arrow