1. Attached Form 1 2. The remainder after deducting the expenses from the proceeds of the sale from the sale by selling the real estate at auction.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the real estate stated in the separate sheet No. 1 is jointly owned by the plaintiff and the defendants in proportion to co-ownership shares listed in the separate sheet No. 2. The plaintiff and the defendants attempted to sell the above real estate and distribute profits therefrom, but did not carry out due to the fee problems. The co-owned property partition agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants does not exist, and the defendants also want to acquire value rather than the above real estate in kind. Thus, the method of auction division is reasonable.

2. In conclusion, we decide to distribute the remaining amount after deducting the auction cost from the proceeds from the sale of the real estate listed in the Attachment No. 1 to the plaintiff and the defendants according to the ratio of co-ownership in attached Form 2 as ordered.