logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.05.31 2018고단5312
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

『2018고단5312』 피고인은 2018. 9. 29. 02:30경 부산 부산진구 B 앞 노상에서, 119구급대원으로부터 ‘피고인이 특별한 이유 없이 욕설을 하면서 도로 한 가운데로 뛰어드는데 제지가 되지 않으니 공조해 달라’는 지원 요청을 받고 출동한 부산진경찰서 C지구대 소속 경위 D가, 차량들이 통행하고 있는 도로로 뛰어드는 피고인을 제지하였다는 이유로 위 경찰관에게 “씨발 좆같은 새끼야.”라고 욕설을 하면서 발로 위 경찰관의 왼쪽 허벅지를 걷어차고, 공무집행방해죄의 현행범인으로 체포되는 과정에서도 위 경찰관의 손등과 왼쪽 정강이를 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. The suspended sentence under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act has the record of being punished several times as violent crimes against the defendant, the fact that the defendant does not have any criminal record exceeding the fine, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the age, character and conduct of the defendant, relationship to the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.;

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The Defendant of the facts charged (2018Gadan5649) at around 02:00 on September 29, 2018, the road in front of Busan Jin-gu Busan apartment on the road, and the police officers and six first-aid workers, etc. dispatched with the notification that they do not endanger the road, taken the scene by the victim E, who is a neighboring resident, while visiting the police officers and six first-aid workers, etc., who are the victim of the defect in order to submit the scene to the said police officers. The Defendant significantly sounded “the victim of the defect in which he/she would have seen to have seen to have seen to have seen the scene.”

arrow