Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for ten months, each of the defendants N.

Defendant N. However, this does not apply to Defendant N.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant A provided information on the account in the name of the borrower who assumes the loaner in the past to the scam criminal investigation staff in the name of the defendant, but did not receive the loan, and the organization of the scam criminal was aware of the fact that the above scam criminal act committed the fraud by collecting the damages by misrepresenting the borrower's account and deceiving the victim to transfer the damages to the above account. The defendant A sent the account number to the above scamer in the name of the above scam criminal organization, and then released the amount of damages from the victim who was hidden by the scam criminal organization, such as the above scamist, to the above scam criminal organization, and received the money from the victim to the above account.

Defendant

A around January 9, 2020, from " Q" operated by P, a branch located in the Seo-gu Busan, Seo-gu P, Busan, a copy of the passbook in the name of the N bank account (S) and a certified copy of the above N's resident registration photographed by the P, which was known through the Kakao Stockholm message, to the officers in charge of the above P.

한편 위 보이스피싱 범죄 조직의 또 다른 조직원은 2020. 1. 10. 11:00경 불상의 장소에서 T회사 U 대리를 사칭하여 전화로 피해자 V에게 “기존 대출금을 상환용 가상계좌인 N 명의의 위 R은행 계좌로 상환하면 추가로 대출을 해주겠다."라고 거짓말하였으나, 사실은 위 조직원은 피해자로부터 돈을 가로챌 생각이었으므로 피해자로부터 돈을 송금 받더라도 기존 대출금을 상환하고 대출해 줄 의사나 능력이 없었다.

As a result, Defendant A conspired with the employees of the aforementioned Bosing criminal investigation officers, by deceiving the victim as above, and transferred KRW 22.6 million from the victim to the above R Bank account in the name of N at around 13:30 on the same day. Defendant A transferred the money to the R Bank account in the name of P and withdrawn the money, and Defendant A divided KRW 6 million and N divided KRW 16.6 million.

As a result, Defendant A is guilty of false name phishing.