1. Defendant A’s imprisonment of one year and three months, Defendant B’s fine of 3,00,000 won, Defendant C’s imprisonment of ten months, and Defendant D.

Punishment of the crime

1. In the event that Defendant A and B filed a claim for insurance money with the insured of an accident insurance, the Defendants were aware of the practice that the insurance company formally examined and paid the insurance money without investigating the contents of the accident, and then were entitled to receive the insurance money by means of long-term hospitalization or additional hospitalization even though it does not require hospitalization on the part of multiple accident insurance.

On December 30, 2005, the Defendants subscribed to 118 insurance and mutual aid agreements among the 111 insurance companies until March 31, 2010, including the fact that Defendant B, as the insured, subscribed to the “non-dividend dividend type type insurance (basic type)” insurance for the new life insurance company (including other insurance companies) (hereinafter referred to as the “company name,” omitted the entry of the company).

Defendant

B From May 17, 2010 to July 20, 2010 of the same month, the Defendant made a statement to F, a doctor of the above hospital, as if hospitalization is necessary, despite having not been placed at the level of injury to the degree of hospitalization, and received KRW 853,738 from the above victims in total as insurance proceeds from March 30, 201 to July 5, 2011.

In addition, from March 30, 201 to April 13, 2012, the Defendants changed the name of illness on a total of four occasions from around March 30, 201 to April 13, 201, and were hospitalized as if Defendant B had suffered injury to the extent of hospitalization, unlike the actual fact, and received total KRW 11,336,955 from the above victims as insurance money.

In this respect.