Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are married people who are engaged in coastal complex fisheries and agriculture.

1. In around 2000, Defendant A purchased three life insurance companies and insurance products for which hospitalization expenses and medical expenses are paid in the event of hospitalization and injury to the victim Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. and the victim Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. around 2006. Around April 7, 2009, Defendant A additionally subscribed to insurance products for which KRW 100,000 per day is paid as per hospitalization daily in the event of hospitalization to the victim for 16 diseases.

After having subscribed to multiple insurance products with a high level of guarantee, the Defendant, even if they were able to receive insurance proceeds, such as hospitalization expenses, daily allowances for hospitalization, and expenses for livers, was formally hospitalized at a hospital which is easy to be hospitalized, and did not receive proper hospitalized treatment while staying out or staying outside. Although the disease requires hospitalized treatment, the Defendant received long-term hospitalized treatment more than necessary, and then, at the time of discharge, submitted relevant documents necessary for the receipt of insurance proceeds, such as a certificate of hospitalization, medical certificate, etc. stating that the relevant hospital had received proper hospitalized treatment, and submitted them to the insurance company.

On April 13, 2009, the Defendant received the diagnosis of “F Hospital”, etc. with the “F Hospital,” etc., from April 13, 2009 to April 27, 2009, and received hospitalized treatment for 15 days from April 13, 2009.

However, even though the above disease treatment is sufficiently possible due to the pain treatment or it is sufficiently possible to be conducted through the hospitalization for a day, the defendant was hospitalized in excess of the proper period with the intention of receiving insurance money, such as hospitalization expenses, daily allowances for hospitalization, and inter-regional expenses, from the insurance company that had already joined.

Nevertheless, the defendant is a non-victim accident insurance company around May 18, 2009.