Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 29, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person who was not the deceased on his name, that “to lend KRW 10,000,000,000 to a third party by setting up a transaction performance by raising credit by sending a physical card; and (b) accepted it; (c) around March 29, 2019, the Defendant issued each physical card and password connected to the Defendant’s name Cbank D account in the name of the Defendant, E BankF account, and each physical card and password connected to the E BankF account in the name of the Defendant, through a home-based engineer.

As a result, the Defendant promised to obtain intangible profits that can receive a loan by raising credit rating through the details of transactions of deposit and withdrawal, and provided two means of access in electronic financial transactions to the name partner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G statements;

1. A certificate of remittance, reply to a request for provision of each financial transaction information, mail card package box, photo of a vehicle delivered with a check card, telephone details printed out, an application form for transaction and a certificate of deposit transaction records, inquiry of transaction details, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the application form;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The act of lending the means of access on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is an act that facilitates various crimes, such as tax evasion, Internet gambling, and entertainment, and such social harm is serious.

As a result of the instant crime, the damage was caused by the instant crime, and the damage was not recovered.

However, the defendant reflects his mistake in depth and has no previous record of the same kind, and the motive and circumstances of the crime of this case, the amount of relevant damage, etc. shall be determined as the order.