Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 09:40 on April 27, 2012, the Defendant connected the Internet homepage D operated by the victim foundation C, and written on the free bulletin board “3 billion won (such as 3 billion Won, e.g., mountain field, e., mountain field, frith, friend, friend, 1.5 billion won, and 400 persons who are in charge of a concurrent public appearance), and received a bribe and received a bribe, and then removed E inspection from the victim foundation, and removed 4,60 billion won at the time of the sale of the E site at the market price of 3 billion won per square day, which was 1.2 billion won or 1.5 billion won per square day, and then divided the amount of KRW 2.3 billion to 4.6 billion at the time of the construction of the current inspection by dividing the amount of KRW 2.3 billion to 4.6 billion, which was 1.3 billion or more at the time of the construction of the subsequent inspection by the director.

In addition, from that to May 27, 2012, the Defendant revealed publicly false information through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the entire seven times, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, and damaged the reputation of the victim foundation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of H and I;

1. Each notice of non-prosecution to J and I;

1. Application of the statutes governing output of the free bulletin board;

1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act argues that the defendant's assertion of the provisional payment order was based on justifiable grounds in believing that it is true or true, and that it does not constitute a crime because it is for the public interest.

However, according to the above evidence, the defendant received a bribe from N and 6.2 billion market price. The defendant received a bribe from N, such as J, K, L, I, M, etc., such as the chairperson and directors of the "victim Foundation."