logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.04.14 2015고정411
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 8. 3. 13:20 경 강원 인제군 C에 있는 D이 운영하는 ‘E 공인 중개사 ’에서, 피해자 F(55 세) 이 피고인이 부동산 중개를 하려고 했던 계약 건을 가로 챈 것에 화가 나, 피해자를 찾아와 사무실 테이블 위에 있던 전기 모 기채를 집어 들어 피해자의 머리 부위를 내리치고, 손으로 피해자의 몸을 밀쳐 그 곳 바닥에 넘어뜨려, 피해자에게 약 2 주간의 치료를 요하는 두 개 내 열린 상처가 없는 상 세 불명의 뇌진탕, 기타 손목 및 손부분의 타박상, 어깨 및 위팔의 타박상, 아래 등 및 골반의 타박상 등을 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. The full or partial statement of the defendant, witness F, and D;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the diagnosis certificate of injury, electrical fixture photographs;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument and the defense counsel asserts that although the defendant had a fact that he had a victim at least once with the electrical conspiracy, the defendant did not cause any injury such as the statement of the facts constituting the crime in the decision.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by this court in addition to the overall purport of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, namely, ① the victim consistently stated that “the defendant gets off his head by electrically flasing his body and was tightly pushed down his body by hand, thereby damaging his body.” At the time D, who was a witness, was the witness at the time from the investigative agency to the investigation agency to this court, when the victim’s head was flad on one occasion by the victim’s head.

The defendant stated at the time of the police investigation that he was the person who was aware of the victim, and ② the victim of the crime of injury.

arrow