logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.07.12 2019고단1661
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who is not a person who is responsible for the act of telecommunications-based financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as "scam") shall organize various stages, such as deceptions, management measures, cash receipt measures, etc., and a person who is responsible for deceptions will make a loan at a low interest by misrepresenting a large number of unspecified victims to a financial institution, investigative agency, etc. by making a phone call without permission.

It is a false statement that it is required to cooperate in investigation and make the victims deposit into a designated account, and the members in charge of the management are engaged in the crime by soliciting cash withdrawal books and cash receipt books, and allowing cash withdrawal books to withdraw when the amount of damage is deposited into the account and to report it to the cash receipt books, and remitting it to the cash receipt books to the account that instructs the cash collection books.

On February 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person in a name-free box (hereinafter “B”) in compliance with the direction of the person in a name-free box (hereinafter “name-free box”); (b) recognized that it is related to the singinginging crime; (c) instead, he/she received specific instructions from the said person (hereinafter “B”), thereby attempting to facilitate the fraud of the singing crime by committing the singing crime under the name-free box (hereinafter “cash”); and (d) instead, recognizing that it is related to the singinging crime.

1. On March 19, 2018, in the case of the victim E’s false statement that “F G and part of the existing loan must be repaid in order to grant the loan,” although the victim did not intend to provide the loan, the victim’s false statement was made, namely, “F G and part of the existing loan must be repaid. He shall be repaid from H loan.” The victim’s statement was made at the J bank account (K) that was secured in advance from the victim E around 11:33, 2018.

arrow