Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant and D are the members of the so-called “H” group, who oppose G, which were the previous pastors of the “Fols Association” affiliated with the President Park Jong-ro Association of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu.

The FGG association is divided into the so-called “non-Subrogation (Emergency Countermeasure Committee) members supporting H” and G, and there is a conflict between them as an internal problem of the church.

At around 10:00 on January 4, 2015, the Defendant, together with D, prevented the victim from entering the course of wedding, such as: (a) in front of the Flusium conference of the Klusium in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, and (b) in front of the Flusium; (c) the victim I tried to drive a boat on a tent distribution; (d) the victim I, by his body of defects, prevented the victim from driving into the course of wedding distribution.

As a result, the defendant assaulted the victim jointly with D and interfered with the exercise of the victim's rights.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. The Defendant and D’s video CD [the Defendant and the defense counsel did not keep the victim in person, and the victim was not in person at the time, and the Defendant did not enter the towing even after the Defendant’s act was terminated, so the Defendant did not interfere with the rights of the victim. However, according to the witness I’s legal statement and the result of this court’s viewing of the video CD reproduction by this court, the Defendant and the defense counsel did not accept the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion that the Defendant and the defense counsel did not interfere with the rights of the victim. However, according to the witness I’s legal statement and the result of this court’s viewing of the video CD reproduction, the Defendant and the defense counsel decided that the victim would enter the towing distribution in person after going through guidance to the members of the towing distribution prior to the towing distribution. The Defendant and the defense counsel did not accept the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion that the victim who were the former company

1. Article 2 (2) 2 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 324 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;