Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The network C is a pastor of the E churches located in D at Kim Jong-si (a disposition of suspension from office from office on December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013), the defendant is the head of the above church, F, and G, and H is the members of the above church.

On March 17, 2013, the Defendant, along with net C, F, G, and H, prevented the Defendant from entering into a church as a matter of course in order to deliver a day’s towing boat, and preventing the Defendant from entering into a church as a matter of course in order to deliver a day’s towing boat.

Furthermore, the network C was kept in the body of the deceased, and the defendant was prevented from having the door of towing dividends with his own lawsuit and other automobiles.

Accordingly, in collusion with net C, F, G, and H, the Defendant interfered with the worship of the above church, such as J, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statements made by the witness K and J in the second trial records;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes confirming facts

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 158 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse.

3. Judgment on the key issue of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. Summary of the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion

A. On March 17, 2013, the non-existence network C, which is the object of interference, publicly announced that the P.M. will not set the P.M. towing at the P.M., and that the network C has a legitimate authority to make the decision, so there is no example that the P.M. worship on the day of the instant case does not exist and there is no example that is the object

Furthermore, the I pastors did not have been engaged in the above Emerial Association for the transfer of worships (hereinafter “the instant church”), but merely have been engaged in conducting affairs concerning the operation of the instant church according to the suspension of the duties of the network C. Thus, it cannot be deemed that there was a separate example transferred by I pastors, different from the o’s p.m. as determined not to be rare C.

B. There was no physical conflict between the non-existence of interference with C, the Defendant, etc., and I pastors and J, etc., and the Defendant left the instant church at the request of I pastors, etc.