1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On June 30, 2013, the Plaintiff’s assertion C disposes of KRW 110,000 per Han River (20km) per Han River (20km) and KRW 80,000 per Han River (20km). The Plaintiff moved 160,000 per Seosan-si D’s total amount of KRW 20,40,000, and 35,000, and completed sorting and packing operations.

However, on July 3, 2013, the defendant brought all of the above-mentioned lectures in E.

Therefore, the defendant should pay the lecture fee to the plaintiff.

2. On September 3, 2014, the Defendant appears on the fifth day for pleading of the instant case, and held that the Defendant was present at the date for pleading of the instant case and brought to the deceased C, thereby bringing to the Plaintiff.

However, in full view of the following circumstances, which can be recognized by the evidence submitted and the witness F’s testimony and the purport of the entire pleadings, i.e., (i) the Plaintiff may interpret that the Plaintiff transferred the lecture to E has exceeded the right to dispose of it, (ii) even if the Plaintiff’s act alone cannot be deemed to have been in excess of the right to dispose of it, the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not directly conclude a contract for the supply of goods as the parties, and (iii) the Defendant remitted KRW 50,000 to G on June 22, 2013, according to the evidence evidence evidence No. 1, it is reasonable to deem that the Defendant paid a reasonable price in relation to the deceased C and brought about a livelihood.

In conclusion, the Plaintiff cannot seek the payment of the amount of tuition to the deceased C’s heir, apart from seeking the payment of the amount of tuition.

The plaintiff's assertion is not accepted.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.