The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On October 201, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s warehouse located in the Si/Gu-U.S. Si/S., sold the raw mouth at will while receiving approximately KRW 300 g of the market value of the injured party C, which is the victim’s possession, from the victim C, and embezzled the proceeds of sale at will after selling it for free while keeping it for the injured party.

2. The evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case has the victim's statement, and the victim purchased dry field with dry field sod and harvested it, and stored 600 posphers free of charge in the Defendant's earth digging. The Defendant sold it and paid back the price.

Therefore, the credibility of the victim's statement is examined.

First, there is no other evidence to support the victim's statement.

둘째, 피고인은 경찰 및 검찰에서, 피해자가 밭떼기로 생강을 구입해서 팔아 수익이 나면 절반씩 나누기로 약정하였고, 이에 피해자가 밭떼기로 생강을 구입하여 2,500∽2,600포대를 수확하였으며(수확과정에서 피고인이 15일 동안 일하였음), 그 중 600포대를 피고인의 창고에 보관시켰고, 그 중 240포대를 매각하였으며, 나머지 360포대 중 130포대는 썩어서 피고인이 버렸고, 나머지 230포대는 피고인이 1,300만원에 매각하였는데, 피해자가 절반씩 나누기로 한 약정을 어기고 피고인에게는 100만원밖에 주지 않았으므로, 위 1,300만원을 피고인이 받아 이를 나누지 않았다고 진술하였다

(A) The Defendant’s statement made on October 16, 2014 that contains somewhat different arguments regarding the sales amount of the mouth and sales amount, etc. However, the basic purpose of the Defendant’s statement is the same). Examining the Defendant’s statement, the amount of sales of the mouth in his custody would not exceed 13 million won. However, even based on the victim’s statement, if the sales amount of the mouth is 12 million won, the sales amount is 12 million won.