beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 6,906,440 to Plaintiff A, KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 2,209,400 to Plaintiff C, respectively.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The relationship between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants 1) Plaintiff A is also a student of the F elementary school located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “F school”) 6 and 7 Ban, and G is a student of the F school 6th and 6th 2018.
2) Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and the Defendants are the parents of G.
B. B. On November 23, 2018, G used Plaintiff A’s lusium, e-mail, and flusium on the 6th half of F grade on November 23, 2018 (hereinafter “the instant assault”) and used Plaintiff A’s lusium, e-mail, and flusium before F grade 6 of F grade 6. As a result of the instant assault, Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as thalin, etc.
(c)
(1) On November 23, 2018, the date of the instant assault, Plaintiff A’s diagnosis and treatment related to the instant assault (hereinafter “H hospital”) received an emergency room of the H hospital located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul (hereinafter “H hospital”) on November 23, 2018. On November 26, 2018, the Plaintiff was provided medical treatment by visiting the H hospital’s emergency room, and on November 26, 2018, three days thereafter.
2) Even thereafter, Plaintiff A was provided medical treatment in the H hospital surgery on November 30, 2018 and December 14, 2018 and December 28, 2018.
3) On December 21, 2018, Plaintiff A was issued with a written request for a comprehensive psychological examination and medical treatment on the grounds of unstable disorder caused by the instant assault from the department of I’s Health and Medical Doctors in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and continued to receive medical treatment and treatment after undergoing an examination by the K Hospital in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “K Hospital”) on January 17, 2019 in accordance with the said written request for counseling.
4) On January 17, 2019, Plaintiff A was diagnosed by the K Hospital as “non-fireing of diversative adaptation and teachers and diversities for education,” and “diversative response,” and in the examination conducted at the K Hospital on September 25, 2019, Plaintiff A was not humpted after the stress case where Plaintiff A was humpted with the head and shoulder of other students at the school ten months prior to their cleaning tool.