logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2019.10.15 2019고단912
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2019, the Defendant accepted a proposal from the singishing staff who misrepresented B Company C by telephone to the effect that “In order to obtain a loan, it is necessary to have a financial transaction record, our country deposited money into the party’s account to raise the transaction performance and transfer the money to us by withdrawing the money if the money is deposited into the party’s account and raising the transaction performance.”

On the other hand, on March 27, 2019, an employee of the above name singinginging singinging singing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing

The Defendant: (a) is different from a general loan method required by the Plaintiff; and (b) is aware that the Defendant was asked by the employees of the Bank in the course of cash withdrawal to question whether the loan method required by the Plaintiff was connected to the scam; and (c) was informed of a financial fraud prevention check check under the item of “Scam to be confirmed at the time of withdrawal/transfer of large cash” and the Defendant was able to use the Defendant’s account for the commission of the scaming; (d) on March 28, 2019, at the E Bank Scam Bae store located in Dong, Dong-si around 1:50 on March 28, 2019 in accordance with the order of the employees of the scaming operation, the Defendant sent KRW 8 million to the above scambing employee, and around that time, sent the above 80 million won to the above scambing employee.

As a result, the Defendant aided and aided the commission of fraud by the employees of the above name scaming scam.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow