A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Force】 On April 23, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on May 1, 2020 to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud aiding and abetting at the Changwon District Court’s Tong-won District Court’s Division, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.

【Criminal Facts】 On September 2019, the Defendant accepted a proposal to the effect that “If the credit rating of the Maspbook is insufficient to open a Maspbook because there is insufficient credit rating from the Maspbook staff who misrepresented B bank’s agent by telephone, she would allow us to deposit money into the Maspbook’s account, and then deliver the money to us.”

On the other hand, on the other hand, an employee in the name light of the above, was transferred five million won from the victim to the post office account (D) in the name of the defendant on September 30, 2019, on the following grounds: (a) the employee in charge of lending B bank by phone calls to the victim C on the end of September 2019; and (b) the employee in charge of lending B bank with a high level of credit rating upon the transaction performance; and (c) the employee in charge was entitled to deposit money in the account so notified.

On September 30, 2019, the Defendant, upon the instruction of the employees of the above name scaming operation, withdrawn KRW 2,00,000 from the window from among the funds obtained through deception deposited into the post office account under the name of the Defendant, and withdrawn KRW 3,00,000 from September 30, 2019 in cash on September 30, 201, and around that time, sent KRW 5,00,000 to the above name scaming operation staff waiting at the F coffee shop in the above name scam.

The Defendant is different from the method of opening a general account, and the Defendant is asked from bank employees whether the method of opening a Masp passbook, which is demanded by the said Masp passbook’s personnel, in the course of cash withdrawal, and asked questions as to whether the Masp passbook was involved in the Masping. The Defendant’s financial fraud prevention tag, “the Masp / the Masp Masp