beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. On December 14, 2015, the Defendant solely committed the Defendant’s criminal act, in the mutual infinite coffee shop located in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, that the Defendant transferred the victim C and the victim D forest E in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do instead of KRW 60 million.
A false statement was made as follows: “The ownership of the forest as above shall be transferred at the face of KRW 20 million.”
However, the defendant did not have any authority over the above forest land, and even if he received money from the victims, he did not have any intention or ability to transfer ownership of the above forest land.
Nevertheless, as seen above, the Defendant had received a total of KRW 38,20,000 from the victims, including by deceiving the victims and receiving KRW 20,000 from the victims on the same day, and received a total of KRW 10,000,000 from the victims as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form.
Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving victims, received property and acquired it by deceit.
2. On November 2, 2016, the Defendant and F, in collusion with F, made a false statement to the victim D that “F would pay a balance of KRW 1.5 billion to the head of the Tong, and KRW 60,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, including, but not limited to, the remaining balance to the head of the Tong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.”
However, the balance of the passbook is not 1.5 billion won, and the defendant and the F did not have the intention or ability to repay even if they receive five million won from the injured party.
Nevertheless, the Defendant and F, as mentioned above, was accused of the victim and issued five million won from the victim.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with F, by deceiving the victim and receiving the property from the victim.
Summary of Evidence
[Judgment No. 1]
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made to D or C;
1. D. Among the two-time suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant, the two-time suspect interrogation protocol.