logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.11.11 2014고단491
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, on July 25, 2008, after being sentenced to three months of imprisonment and one year and three months of imprisonment at the Incheon District Court, the execution of the above sentence was completed on April 23, 2009. On January 24, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 11, 2013.

1. Defendant A, along with E and F, conspiredd with the victim G who requires a large amount of project funds, as if Defendant A was the former head of the agricultural branch, Defendant A had the wind as if Defendant A was the former head of the agricultural branch, and Defendant A had the real estate loan amounting to KRW 500 million on the face of KRW 100 million on the face of the former head of the agricultural branch, or had the payment guarantee issued.

Defendant

A, along with E and F on March 2010, at the coffee shop in the first time near the new subway Station in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, the first time, 2010, stating that “A may promptly prepare the business fund of at least KRW 500,000,00,000 if it is necessary to prepare for KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.” The Defendant A provided that “A may raise more than KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00

In addition, Defendant E said, around April 1, 2010, Defendant E issued a payment guarantee letter equivalent to KRW 500,000,000 to the victim, because it was difficult to lend real estate at the coffee shop in the trade name near Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu.

However, Defendant A was not the head of a former agricultural branch, and Party E and F were aware of all of them, so even if the victim received money, Defendant A did not have an intention or ability to issue a real estate loan or payment guarantee certificate equivalent to KRW 500 million to the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant, E, and F deceiving the victim as such, and they belong thereto on March 11, 2010 from the victim.

arrow