logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.12.22 2017고정932
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 High Doz. 932]

1. From June 2016, the Defendant who interfered with his/her duties filed several complaints with the employees of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul apartment management office, including the victim D, who is the head of the apartment management office, from around 101 to 306, which was the Defendant’s residence, on several occasions, on the grounds that the management office did not properly accommodate the complaints. However, on August 9, 2016, the apartment management office around August 17:40, 2016, the Defendant brought conflicts to the employees of the management office, including the victim D, who is the head of the apartment management office of Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, which was the Defendant’s residence, on several occasions. “A person is not

No work may be performed properly.

Abandoning duties

The management of the apartment management office of the victim was obstructed by force of approximately 20 minutes until the police arrives at around 18:01 on the same day by putting the crypian in large interest, putting the crypian, putting the crypian, continuing to write the cryp, making the cryp, making a report on the cryp.

2. Definating;

A. On June 10, 2016, the Defendant, at the Seongbuk-gu Seoul apartment management office around 09:10 on June 10, 2016, referred to the Defendant’s return of the two milk to the management office, on the ground that the Defendant was at the expiration of one month, and that the Defendant had returned the two milk distribution period that was attached to the management office of Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, the Defendant made a statement to the victim D’s return, and the Defendant’s statement to the effect that “I would am away from her husband, but did not go against her husband,” and continued to make a statement to the victim, such as “I would am frien. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma.” while she took part against the victim, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim during the period in which E, a private person of the said apartment management office, was heard.

나. 2016. 8. 9. 자 모욕 피고인은 제 1 항 기재 일시, 장소에서 그곳에 앉아 있던 피해자 E에게 그가 2016. 6. 경 겪은 구 안와 사로 안면 근육 일부가 일그러지는 현상이 나타나는 상황임에도 “ 입이 삐뚤어진 게 나 때문에 그랬다고

They set forth.

입은 삐뚤어져도 말은 똑바로 하라” 고 큰소리로 말하여 D가 듣고 있는 가운데...

arrow