logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.01.19 2016고단2022
변호사법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Violation of defensive justice;

A. With respect to the “C Corporation” ordered in the mountain, mountain, mountain, and mountain, the Defendant received a request from the E-W to recommend a supply company of the government-funded materials required for the above construction from the E-W in the mountain, mountain, and mountain. Around that time, the Defendant contacted the I of H Executive Director for the purpose of manufacturing and selling lighting devices located in the G in the North, west-gun, North, and the Defendant demanded that the said company’s products be delivered to the YY-si, mountain and mountain, and that the I accepted the said request later.

Therefore, the Defendant, through the business of the public officials in charge of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Geum River (hereinafter “C Corporation”) around April 2010, ordered by the said company at the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the mountain of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “C Corporation”) to receive a contract for the “C Corporation’s purchase of the main water supply price” (hereinafter “C Corporation’s purchase price”) from the said company. On May 2010, 2010, the Defendant was able to receive a contract for the “C Corporation’s purchase of the main water supply price” (hereinafter “C Corporation’s purchase of the water supply price”) from the said company at around 00,000,000,0000 office fees, and received from the said company around 30,010,000 office fees.

As a result, the defendant received a total of KRW 54,00,000 on two occasions under the pretext of solicitation or good offices on the affairs handled by the public officials in charge of the Si of the mountain and Myun.

B. The Defendant contacted K Managing Director L for the purpose of the business of manufacturing lighting equipment in the Jeonjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan CityJ, and demanded to supply the above company products through the business such as solicitation or arrangement to the public officials in charge of local government. Accordingly, L requested money in the name of the commission.

the same shall apply.

arrow