A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 26, 2014, at around 01:15, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported on the ground of assaulting B in the exit No. 335 U.S. 8, the Defendant: (b) provided a bath to “the victim D, a police box affiliated with the annual police station, who was called out after having received a 112 report on the ground of assaulting B at the exit No. 335 U.S.S. 8; and (c) provided a bath to “the victim, who was known of his house, will come to her house, and will come to her house.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting processing duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement B and D to the police protocol;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reasoning for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] is above the following: (a) there is no basic area (6-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months), and there is no special person [decision of sentence] (decision of sentence] degree of assault; (b) the defendant is against the defendant; and (c) there is no other criminal records other than one fine. It is so decided as per Disposition.