logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2020.06.17 2020고정125
수산업법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

C is the captain of the west-gun, Seocheon-gun, the coastwise Coastal Vessel D (9.77 tons, the mother ship). The defendant A is the captain of the coastwise Vessel D (9.77 tons, the subsidiary ship). The defendant B is the captain of the coastwise Vessel D (9.77 tons, the subsidiary ship). The defendant B is the owner of the vessel and the subsidiary ship D.

1. A person who intends to carry on coastal fishing boat fishing using a defendant C or a powered fishing vessel with a gross tonnage of less than 10 tons shall obtain permission for each fishing vessel or fishing gear from the Mayor/Do Governor;

The Do and its affiliated vessels D have obtained a fishery permit (Secheon-gun Coastal Network E) from the Gun of west-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and it has not obtained a fishery permit from the Gun of west-do to operate only for the only one source of the sea area in Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and it has not obtained a fishery permit that is able to operate in the

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인들은, ① 2019. 9. 8. 12:46경 충남 마량항에서 피고인 C은 위 본선 D(9.77톤)의 선장으로, 피고인 A는 부속선 D(9.77톤)의 선장으로 각각 승선ㆍ출항하여, 2019. 9. 9. 13:45경 군산시 비응도동 비응항 서방 약 10해리 인근해상에서 본선에 적재되어 있던 연안선망 어구(섶그물, 몸그물, 고기받이 그물 등으로 구성) 1틀의 섶그물 한쪽 고삐줄과 죔줄 끝을 부속선 D가 넘겨받아, 본선과 부선이 합동으로 원을 그리듯이 연안선망 어구 1틀을 투ㆍ양망하는 방법으로 조업하여 시가 10만 원 상당의 멸치 약 10kg을 포획하고, ②

9. At around 17:45, 30: (a) around 7.5 nautical miles adjacent to the west-do, west-do, west-do, North Korea: (b) captured 15 km equivalent to KRW 200,000 at the market price, using a method of joint operation using a coastal network fishing gear, such as paragraph (1).

2. Defendant B: (a) and (b) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and (3) of this Article, Defendant C, an employee of the Defendant, had the Defendant commit an act of violation as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The transfer site for police (report on detection of fishing vessels in violation of the Fisheries Act).

arrow