logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.01.20 2014고정1302
청소년보호법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around 22:50 on May 16, 2014, the Defendant sold 2,00c and 1 disease, which are drugs harmful to juveniles, to E (F) at the D main points located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, B103 and B104.

2. The defendant's assertion that he did not know that he was a juvenile.

3. In light of the following circumstances, the defendant's statement in this court and the statement in E, which seems to be consistent with the fact that he sold alcoholic beverages knowing that he was a juvenile, although there was a statement in this court and the statement in this court, that is, the defendant's main points are the main points of the above main points, G's employees receiving orders from E and gave alcoholic beverages to E, and at the time, G demanded the above main points to produce identification cards to E and his relative H. At the time, after verifying the H's identification cards, he was not a juvenile, and although he did not produce identification cards, he was not a juvenile, and it was announced to G that he was not a H's relative and not a juvenile, since he was adult as 18 years of age at the time of this case and he was not a juvenile's friendship and was not a juvenile's friendship, and therefore, G's speech that he was not a juvenile, and it appears to correspond to alcoholic beverages to E, therefore, there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that the defendant, the main points of this.

4. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime, and thus, the court acquitted the defendant under the latter part of Article 325

arrow