logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.10.28 2019고단1094
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On June 21, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment by the Jeju District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc., and on October 6, 2016, the Jeju District Court sentenced the Defendant to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, which became final and conclusive on December 16, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence by the Jeju Prison on June 18, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant, “2019 Highest 1094,” who came to know at a meeting, she saw the victim B with a re-satise and accessed the meeting to use it for living expenses, etc. by receiving money from the victim.

1. 피고인은 2017. 12. 21.경 위 피해자에게 제주시 노형동 부근 인근 피고인이 운행하는 BMW 승용차 안에서 피해자에게 '1억 원을 주고 땅을 잡아 놨는데 6,000만 원이 없어서 1억 원을 날리게 생겼다.

The loan shall be paid within three months from the security of the four books.

B. A person has the ability to complete construction, interior works, and a referring is the owner of an apartment, etc.

'' makes a false statement with the content.

However, the defendant did not have any property or income at the time, and there was no fact that he intended to purchase real estate by investing KRW 100 million, and even if he received money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to purchase the real estate or to repay it to the victim.

Nevertheless, on December 29, 2017, the Defendant was deprived of the victim and was transferred KRW 52 million from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant on December 29, 2017.

2. On December 16, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “I would see that I would see if I would see that I would see that I would see that I would see that I would not lose Kakao Stockholm messages. I would see that I would lend 50,000 won.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have lost a wall, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he thought that he will use it for living expenses.

arrow