A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant 3,131,00 won and 400,000 won against the applicant for compensation to D.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on April 2017, 2017, tried to obtain money from the victim by advertising that he/she had been influencing and teaching his/her occupation as a Kacul who works in Germany with the victim F (at 29 years of age) at his/her age club.

On April 28, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “The Defendant was engaged in trial operation on the road for the racing located in Songdo. In this case, the Defendant would immediately repay the necessary expenses and the amount of money for his/her friendship, if he/she borrowed the money for his/her marriage. At present, the Defendant made a criminal complaint due to legal problems arising from the occurrence of legal problems, and if the case is resolved, the seizure of the head of Tong may be paid immediately.”

However, the fact was that the defendant did not act in Germany, there was no criminal case filed by the defendant or there was no seizure of the passbook, and there was no intention or ability to repay because it was planned to use money as living expenses, etc. from the victim.

As such, the Defendant, as described in the attached Table 1, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 500,00 from the victim to the corporate bank account (Account Number: H) in the name of G, and acquired it by defrauding it, received total of KRW 119,609,300 from the City to October 1, 2018.

The Defendant and the Victim I became aware of the mobile game ‘J' around July 2017.

1. On September 2017, the Defendant: (a) by fraud under the name of an agency for the purchase of game items, concluded that the Defendant would compel the victim to purchase the items at a low level through the Kakao Kakao Stockholm; (b) by fraud, the Defendant would have the purchasing agency for the purchase of the items to purchase the items at a low level; and (c) would have the cost of the purchase of the items received after one week thereafter.

However, the defendant received money from the victim as the purchase cost of items and thought that he will use it for the cost of living.