A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 14, 2013, at around 21:35, the Defendant: (a) opened a bus terminal located in Sin Seo-gu, Sin Seo-si, Sin-si, in order to frist a fire without any special reasons; (b) opened a male toilet to the left-hand part of the front left part of the string part; (c) opened a plastic stop which contains a stop in which the head of the string part is suspended; and (d) moved back again to the string part of the string part of the string part in the same way and put the string part into the plastic stop which contains a stop in which the head of the string part of the string part of the string part of the string part of the string part of the string part of the 2013.

In this regard, the defendant laid a building, which is used for the public interest, but did not commit it but did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. C’s statement;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a fire accident, reporting on investigation, and application of statutes on site inspection reports;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 174 and 165 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 25 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of attempted crimes;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be repeated for the reason of sentencing):

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Probation Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, Etc., the Defendant asserts that the Defendant committed the instant crime under a state of mental disability due to a delay in the mental retardation of longitude and subsequent shock disorder.

According to the records, the defendant is being treated as 55 points in intelligence index, and treatment is continued from April 2006 to August 201, 201, such as mountain delivery, concentration decline, loyalty adjustment, appraisal adjustment, and recognition ability degradation.